On 05/23/2018 11:11 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 23.05.2018 19:47, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 05/23/2018 10:29 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>>> On 23.05.2018 17:50, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>> On 05/23/2018 08:28 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>>> On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>>>>>> On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>>>>> On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> eth0 (vlan 101 tagged) <=> lan 1-lan4
>>>>>>>>> (vlan 101
>>>>>>>>> untagged pvid)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> br1 <=> eth0.102 <=> eth0 (vlan 102 tagged) <=> wan (vlan 102
>>>>>>>>> untagged pvid)
>>>>>>>> Do you even need these vlans?
>>>>>>> Yes, remember, b53 does not currently turn on Broadcom tags, so the
>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>> way to segregate traffic is to have VLANs for that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you doing this for port separation? To keep lan1-4 traffic
>>>>>>>> separate from wan? DSA does that by default, no vlan needed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So you can just do
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ip link add name br0 type bridge
>>>>>>>> ip link set dev br0 up
>>>>>>>> ip link set dev lan1 master br0
>>>>>>>> ip link set dev lan2 master br0
>>>>>>>> ip link set dev lan3 master br0
>>>>>>>> ip link set dev lan4 master br0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and use interface wan directly, no bridge needed.
>>>>>>> That would work once Broadcom tags are turned on which requires
>>>>>>> turning
>>>>>>> on managed mode, which requires work that I have not been able to
>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>> done :)
>>>>>> Setup with swconfig:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #!/usr/bin/bash
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> INTERFACE=eth0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # Delete all IP addresses and get link up
>>>>>> ip addr flush dev ${INTERFACE}
>>>>>> ip link set ${INTERFACE} up
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # Lamobo R1 aka BPi R1 Routerboard
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> # Speaker | LAN1 | LAN2 | LAN3 | LAN4 || LAN5 | HDMI
>>>>>> # SW-Port | P2 | P1 | P0 | P4 || P3 |
>>>>>> # VLAN | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 ||ALL(t)|
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> # Switch-Port P8 - ALL(t) boards internal CPU Port
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # Setup switch
>>>>>> swconfig dev ${INTERFACE} set reset 1
>>>>>> swconfig dev ${INTERFACE} set enable_vlan 1
>>>>>> swconfig dev ${INTERFACE} vlan 101 set ports '3 8t'
>>>>>> swconfig dev ${INTERFACE} vlan 102 set ports '4 0 1 2 8t'
>>>>>> swconfig dev ${INTERFACE} set apply 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How to achieve this setup CURRENTLY with DSA?
>>>>> Your first email had the right programming sequence, but you did not
>>>>> answer whether you have CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING enabled or not,
>>>>> which is likely your problem.
>>>> Here are some reference configurations that should work:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/armbian/build/issues/511#issuecomment-320473246
>>> I know, some comments are from me but none of them worked, therefore on
>>> LKML :-)
>> I see, maybe you could have started there, that would have saved me a
>> trip to github to find out the thread.
>>
>>> /boot/config-4.16.7-100.fc26.armv7hl:CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING=y
>>>
>>> so this can't be the issue, any further ideas?
>> Yes, remove the "self" from your bridge vlan commands, I don't see that
>> being necessary.
>
> Same:
> [root@bpi ~]# bridge vlan add dev lan1 vid 101 pvid untagged self
> RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported
> [root@bpi ~]# bridge vlan add dev lan1 vid 101 pvid untagged
> RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported
> [root@bpi ~]# bridge vlan add dev lan1 vid 101
> RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported
>
> Any ideas how to debug further?
Not particularly no, you would have to trace through the code where this
is failing, strace might give a first level of clue.
>
>>
>>> On my 2nd Banana Pi-R1 still on Fedora 25 with kernel
>>> 4.12.8-200.fc25.armv7hl the commands still work well, but I wanted to
>>> test the upgrade on another one.
>>>
>>> /boot/config-4.12.8-200.fc25.armv7hl:CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING=y
>> Is using an upstream or compiled by yourself kernel an option at all? I
>> have no clue what is in a distribution kernel.
>
> Typically the Fedora kernels work fine (long term experience since
> Fedora Core 1 from 2004 :-) ). I had some custom patches in there in the
> past for external RTC and b53_switch.kernel_4.5+.patch, but otherwise no
> topics. Therefore with upstream DSA support that should be fine then.
>
>
> Infos can be found here:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1078638
>
>
> Ciao,
>
> Gerhard
>
>
--
Florian
