On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 09:02:20AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 05:43 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 05:36:48PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 13:59 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > > > /* The first entry is a placeholder for the
On Thu, 17 May 2007 09:02:20 EDT, Ben Collins said:
> > So we just have to live with it, and the infinitesimal speed hit it
> > creates :)
>
> Any objection to adding it to planned-for-removal and spitting out a
> printk when someone uses the "feature"?
Do we have any good reason to believe that
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 05:43 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 05:36:48PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 13:59 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > > /* The first entry is a placeholder for the insmod-specified
> > > > device */
> > > > - { USB_DEVICE(0
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 05:36:48PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 13:59 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > /* The first entry is a placeholder for the insmod-specified device */
> > > -{ USB_DEVICE(0x049F, 0x0003) },
> >
> > Is it obvious why this patch is correct? Es
4 matches
Mail list logo
