On Thu, 17 May 2007 09:02:20 EDT, Ben Collins said: > > So we just have to live with it, and the infinitesimal speed hit it > > creates :) > > Any objection to adding it to planned-for-removal and spitting out a > printk when someone uses the "feature"?
Do we have any good reason to believe that this will eventually lead to a clean-up? ISTR that we did a similar printk for sysctl (or as Dr. Phil likes to say, "How's that working for you?")
pgpGx5bfTrNpL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
