On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:17:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Heh. That was the original implementation by Uri. I felt that was
> wrong because _IOW() encodes the size in the ioctl number, bit the
> actual size is different.
That really shouldn't be a problem. After all the pointer approach
d
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 19:04, Avi Kivity wrote:
+struct kvm_msr_entry {
+ __u32 index;
+ __u32 reserved;
+ __u64 data;
+};
+
+/* for KVM_GET_MSRS and KVM_SET_MSRS */
+struct kvm_msrs {
+ __u32 vcpu;
+ __u32 nmsrs; /* number of msrs in e
On Thursday 16 November 2006 19:04, Avi Kivity wrote:
> +struct kvm_msr_entry {
> + __u32 index;
> + __u32 reserved;
> + __u64 data;
> +};
> +
> +/* for KVM_GET_MSRS and KVM_SET_MSRS */
> +struct kvm_msrs {
> + __u32 vcpu;
> + __u32 nmsrs; /* number of msrs in entries
3 matches
Mail list logo