On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:17:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Heh. That was the original implementation by Uri. I felt that was > wrong because _IOW() encodes the size in the ioctl number, bit the > actual size is different.
That really shouldn't be a problem. After all the pointer approach doesn't encode the transfered size either. Given that the variable sized array gives a much cleaner interface you should use it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
