On 8/15/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't recall what specifically went wrong when we were using select
> in there, but it was pretty ugly.
>
> We're hitting more and more problems with this "select is
> broken"-versus-"depends-on user inferface sucks" problem.
How about if
On 8/15/07, Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lee wrote:
> > [altho' methinks CPUSET should select CONTAINERS rather than
> > depend on it...]
>
> Good point -- what do you think, Paul Menage?
That's how I made the configs originally; akpm asked me to invert the
dependencies to use "depend
Christoph wrote (and Lee quoted):
> Looks like we need to fix cpuset nodemasks for the !NUMA case then?
> It cannot expect to find valid nodemasks if !NUMA.
The code in kernel/cpuset.c should be written as if there are always
valid nodemasks. In the case of !NUMA, it will happen that there is
onl
3 matches
Mail list logo
