Christoph wrote (and Lee quoted):
> Looks like we need to fix cpuset nodemasks for the !NUMA case then?
> It cannot expect to find valid nodemasks if !NUMA.
The code in kernel/cpuset.c should be written as if there are always
valid nodemasks. In the case of !NUMA, it will happen that there is
only one node, but kernel/cpuset.c should not manifest that detail.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
