Re: [Xen-devel] [patch 03/44] usermodehelper: split setup from execution

2007-07-16 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Rusty Russell wrote: > The patch seems fine, but the names are awkward. They've always been > awkward (it's *userspace* helper, not *usermode* helper), but this just > shines a bright light on them. > > So how about: > > call_usermodehelper_setup -> create_userspace_helper > call_userm

Re: [Xen-devel] [patch 03/44] usermodehelper: split setup from execution

2007-07-16 Thread Rusty Russell
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 16:15 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > plain text document attachment (usermodehelper-split-init.patch) > Rather than having hundreds of variations of call_usermodehelper for > various pieces of usermode state which could be set up, split the > info allocation and initializ