On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 09:11:34AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> So the premise of the patch is good and is worth updating and upstreaming?
Yes.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 08:19:27AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > We call our reference counts use count but this was in fact the original
> > > design, the local reference counts got dropped due to David Brownel
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 08:19:27AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> > We call our reference counts use count but this was in fact the original
> > design, the local reference counts got dropped due to David Brownell's
> > forceful insistance :/
> So I should pull
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:46:24AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > To locate a consumer that currently holds a regulattor, a new sysfs
> > entry is created. The consumer are published in
> > /sys/class/regulator/regulator.<#>/use.
>
> We call our reference
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:46:24AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> To locate a consumer that currently holds a regulattor, a new sysfs
> entry is created. The consumer are published in
> /sys/class/regulator/regulator.<#>/use.
We call our reference counts use count but this was in fact the original
des
Please excuse any poor formatting that may occur, as this is
copy-paste into my mailer, but what do you think of this idea?
To locate a consumer that currently holds a regulattor, a new sysfs
entry is created. The consumer are published in
/sys/class/regulator/regulator.<#>/use.
---
drivers/regu
6 matches
Mail list logo
