On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 08:19:27AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > We call our reference counts use count but this was in fact the original > > > design, the local reference counts got dropped due to David Brownell's > > > forceful insistance :/ > > > So I should pull the patch? > > Not sure what you mean by pull; a stright revert won't work.
Sorry, perhaps I should have been clearer. Is the patch any good, or should I throw it in the bin (pull it)? > > How do you feel about being able to access it via sysfs? Good or bad > > idea? If it's a good idea, I can always change the name of the > > variable? > > That or debugfs. So the premise of the patch is good and is worth updating and upstreaming? -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
