On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:58:25PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Friday, November 30, 2012 12:44:06 PM Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:09:40PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Friday, November 30, 2012 10:57:55 AM Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:45:44AM -0
On Friday, November 30, 2012 12:44:06 PM Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:09:40PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Friday, November 30, 2012 10:57:55 AM Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:45:44AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > However you snipped the rest of my re
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:09:40PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Friday, November 30, 2012 10:57:55 AM Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:45:44AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > However you snipped the rest of my reply: do we really need to renumber
> > > ioctls? There is no ben
On Friday, November 30, 2012 10:57:55 AM Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:45:44AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > However you snipped the rest of my reply: do we really need to renumber
> > ioctls? There is no benefit for the driver as its ioctl handler does
> > not parse the numbers i
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:45:44AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> However you snipped the rest of my reply: do we really need to renumber
> ioctls? There is no benefit for the driver as its ioctl handler does
> not parse the numbers into components.
I don't know if you need to renumber, I really
On Friday, November 30, 2012 10:39:18 AM Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:20:41AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Friday, November 30, 2012 09:09:21 AM Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:47:46AM -0800, Andy King wrote:
> > > > I didn't get the resend either, so it seems
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:20:41AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Friday, November 30, 2012 09:09:21 AM Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:47:46AM -0800, Andy King wrote:
> > > I didn't get the resend either, so it seems our corporate mail really is
> > > eating messages. Lovely.
>
On Friday, November 30, 2012 09:09:21 AM Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:47:46AM -0800, Andy King wrote:
> > I didn't get the resend either, so it seems our corporate mail really is
> > eating messages. Lovely.
> >
> > > > > +#define IOCTLCMD(_cmd) IOCTL_VMCI_ ## _cmd
> > > >
> > > >
On Monday, November 26, 2012 04:32:39 PM Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:23:57PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > For some reason it still didn't go through to our corporate mail server
> > but I see it on LKML.
>
> Good.
>
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:03:04PM -08
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 07:32:55PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 06:05:38PM -0700, George Zhang wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/Makefile
> > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> > +
> > +#
> > +
10 matches
Mail list logo