On Friday, November 30, 2012 10:57:55 AM Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:45:44AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > However you snipped the rest of my reply: do we really need to renumber > > ioctls? There is no benefit for the driver as its ioctl handler does > > not parse the numbers into components. > > I don't know if you need to renumber, I really don't understand what you > were trying to do with this code, and as it was acting differently from > all other kernel ioctl declarations, I asked for some clarity. > > If you can rewrite it to look sane, and keep the same numbers, that's > fine with me.
OK, it looks like we can redo them as: #define IOCTL_VMCI_VERSION _IO(7, 0x9f) /* 1951 */ #define IOCTL_VMCI_INIT_CONTEXT _IO(7, 0xa0) /* 1952 */ Is this acceptable? Thanks, Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
