On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:54:41PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> @all: The granularity level is per-directory. Greg was okay with that, speak
> up
> if you strongly disagree. I am really going for consistency here, not patch
> count (and to avoid patches on per-driver level which I already got a f
> Just to be sure, the 4 other patches you sent also need to go in here
> for 3.19, right? They were not included in this pull request?
Yes, they are bugfixes and should go into v3.19 IMO. I sent them as
seperate patches so people could review them (which was not necessary
for the patches in the
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:54:41PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> as discussed at ELCE, here is my pull request for cleaning up all unneeded
> assignment of .owner for platform drivers. I used the following semantic patch
> to check that it only removes it when .owner gets initialized b
Hi Greg,
as discussed at ELCE, here is my pull request for cleaning up all unneeded
assignment of .owner for platform drivers. I used the following semantic patch
to check that it only removes it when .owner gets initialized by the call to
register the driver:
---
@match1@
declarer name module_p
4 matches
Mail list logo
