On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:54:41PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > @all: The granularity level is per-directory. Greg was okay with that, speak > up > if you strongly disagree. I am really going for consistency here, not patch > count (and to avoid patches on per-driver level which I already got a few for > my subsystem). Also, I have not CCed all the mailing lists, since Greg > suggested that he'd pull this series. If people prefer, I can resend this mail > with all lists on CC.
Not sure if it'll come up again but it is generally nicer to at least tell the subsystem maintainers that there's a patch being sent so they're not surprised by conflicts, especially with this sort of stylistic change where it's not something there's been much advertisment of. I think there's some scripts that go along with the cocci stuff to mail things out without needing to spam everyone in one message. /me just ran into another conflict with this which he had to think about so is being a bit grumpy.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
