Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 03:15:39PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
survived ~20 hours of stress test without any pr
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 03:15:39PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
> >> all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
> >> survived ~20 hours of stress test without any problem.
> >
> > So
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 03:15:39PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
> >> all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
> >> survived ~20 hours of stress test without any problem.
> >
> > So
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(r) Pro*
Tejun Heo wrote:
Dude, what are you smoking and can I get some? The attached patch is to
trigger the race conditions more easily for verification. Actual fixes
are in the three patches posted as reply to the head message.
Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(r) Pro*
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>
>> This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
>> all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
>> survived ~20 hours of str
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(r) Pro*
Tejun Heo wrote:
This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
survived ~20 hours of stress test without any problem.
Seriously,
Andrew Morton wrote:
>> This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
>> all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
>> survived ~20 hours of stress test without any problem.
>
> So these are being proposed for 2.6.22?
Yeap.
> I do wonder about Rafae
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:01:07 +0900 Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently, there are several race conditions around dentry/inode
> reclamation.
>
> a. sysfs_dirent->s_dentry dereferencing in sysfs_readdir()
>
> b. sysfs_dirent->s_dentry dereferencing in sysfs_drop_dentry()
>
> c. sysf
Hello, all.
Currently, there are several race conditions around dentry/inode
reclamation.
a. sysfs_dirent->s_dentry dereferencing in sysfs_readdir()
b. sysfs_dirent->s_dentry dereferencing in sysfs_drop_dentry()
c. sysfs_dirent->s_dentry clearing in sysfs_d_iput()
All aboves are done without s
9 matches
Mail list logo