Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 03:15:39PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Andrew Morton wrote: >>>> This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With >>>> all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel >>>> survived ~20 hours of stress test without any problem. >>> So these are being proposed for 2.6.22? >> Yeap. >> >>> I do wonder about Rafael's bug which he bisected down to >>> gregkh-driver-sysfs-use-singly-linked-list-for-sysfs_dirent-tree.patch. >>> >>> If that won't be a problem in this patchset then I spose it's probably best >>> to go ahead with a 2.6.22 merge, but it's more a Greg thing than a me >>> thing. >> I'm currently debugging that and it's irrelevant to these fixes. The >> bug is introduced far after the fixes. >> >>> I don't have a tree to merge these patches into, unless I drop all the >>> patches which are in Greg's tree. >>> >>> Greg, can I leave it up to you to decide how we are to proceed here? >> I can rebase all sysfs patches in -mm on top of linus#master + these >> fixes if necessary. > > Ok, I've sent these to Linus, so if he takes them, can you rebase your > patches on top of this and resend the whole tree to me (or just the ones > that needed to be modified, if that's easier.)
Sure thing. > thanks again for this fix, I really appreciate it. :-) -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
