Hi Emese,
Sorry for my late reply.
> Thanks for the patch. I tested it and there is a problem when I run a
> parallel make.
> The plugins are compiled later than needed (e.g., scripts/mod/empty.o). There
> is a lot of important
> code under scripts/mod which may need the plugins.
Ah, I missed
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:39:32 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > I tried to remove the gcc-plugins target but sadly in this case the plugins
> > aren't complied.
> > I don't know if I understand how it should work. I pushed a commit:
> > https://github.com/ephox-gcc-plugins/gcc-plugins_linux-next/c
Hi Emese,
2016-03-24 9:07 GMT+09:00 Emese Revfy :
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:25:19 +0900
> Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> You sprinkle "gcc-plugins" target in the top Makefile, which I do not like.
>>
>> Can you descend into scripts/gcc-plugins from scripts/Makefile?
>>
>>
>> subdir-$(CONFIG_MODVER
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:25:19 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> You sprinkle "gcc-plugins" target in the top Makefile, which I do not like.
>
> Can you descend into scripts/gcc-plugins from scripts/Makefile?
>
>
> subdir-$(CONFIG_MODVERSIONS) += genksyms
> subdir-y += mod
>
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:41:36 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > The scripts name also doesn't describe gcc plugins well.
>
> With my suggestion "scripts/gcc-plugins/",
> the sub-directory name describes it very well.
>
>
> > Plugins take part in the image building process
> > in a different way
2016-03-16 21:49 GMT+09:00 PaX Team :
> On 16 Mar 2016 at 16:34, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> >> As mentioned above, I want you to use "..." style
>> >> when you need to use relative path from the source.
>> >>
>> >> I do not see most of them in tools/gcc/.
>> >
>> > no, that'd be incorrect
On 16 Mar 2016 at 16:34, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
Hi,
> >> As mentioned above, I want you to use "..." style
> >> when you need to use relative path from the source.
> >>
> >> I do not see most of them in tools/gcc/.
> >
> > no, that'd be incorrect for several reasons. first, the rule to use <...>
Hi Emese,
2016-03-15 5:52 GMT+09:00 Emese Revfy :
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:25:19 +0900
> Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> Maybe scripts/gcc-plugins/ is better than tools/gcc ?
>>
>> In the directory "scripts/", we have several tools used during
>> building the kernel image.
>> We have some optional pr
Hi PaX,
2016-03-15 6:25 GMT+09:00 PaX Team :
> On 11 Mar 2016 at 15:25, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> > diff --git a/scripts/gcc-plugin.sh b/scripts/gcc-plugin.sh
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index 000..eaa4fce
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/scripts/gcc-plugin.sh
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
>> > +#!
On 11 Mar 2016 at 15:25, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > diff --git a/scripts/gcc-plugin.sh b/scripts/gcc-plugin.sh
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..eaa4fce
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/scripts/gcc-plugin.sh
> > @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> > +#!/bin/sh
> > +srctree=$(dirname "$0")
> > +gccplugins_dir=
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:25:19 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Maybe scripts/gcc-plugins/ is better than tools/gcc ?
>
> In the directory "scripts/", we have several tools used during
> building the kernel image.
> We have some optional programs in the directory "tools/", which are not used
> for b
Hi Emese,
I am not familiar with GCC plugins.
Comments from the view of Kbuild.
2016-03-07 8:04 GMT+09:00 Emese Revfy :
> This patch allows to build the whole kernel with GCC plugins. It was ported
> from
> grsecurity/PaX. The infrastructure supports building out-of-tree modules and
> building
On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 12:50:26 -0800
Kees Cook wrote:
> > Feel free to fold these into your patch, or, if you prefer, I can send
> > out separate patches for them.
>
> Ah-ha, great! Thanks for testing!
>
> Emese, if you're not interested in carrying this, I can add it to my tree.
I think it is ea
On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 02:01:15 -0700
David Brown wrote:
> Feel free to fold these into your patch, or, if you prefer, I can send
> out separate patches for them.
Thanks, I'll take it.
--
Emese
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:01 AM, David Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:04:27AM +0100, Emese Revfy wrote:
>
>> This patch allows to build the whole kernel with GCC plugins. It was
>> ported from
>> grsecurity/PaX. The infrastructure supports building out-of-tree modules
>> and
>> building
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:04:27AM +0100, Emese Revfy wrote:
This patch allows to build the whole kernel with GCC plugins. It was ported from
grsecurity/PaX. The infrastructure supports building out-of-tree modules and
building in a separate directory. Cross-compilation is supported too but
curr
This patch allows to build the whole kernel with GCC plugins. It was ported from
grsecurity/PaX. The infrastructure supports building out-of-tree modules and
building in a separate directory. Cross-compilation is supported too but
currently only the x86 architecture enables plugins.
The directory
17 matches
Mail list logo
