Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] arch/arm: support seccomp

2012-11-15 Thread Will Deacon
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 08:23:48PM +, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:07:13PM +, Kees Cook wrote: > >> Hi, any more thoughts on this series? I'd really like to get it into > >> -next. It's been running happily for a whil

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] arch/arm: support seccomp

2012-11-15 Thread Will Drewry
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:07:13PM +, Kees Cook wrote: >> Hi, any more thoughts on this series? I'd really like to get it into >> -next. It's been running happily for a while now in the Chrome OS ARM >> devices. > > I'm not familiar with se

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] arch/arm: support seccomp

2012-11-15 Thread Kees Cook
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:07:13PM +, Kees Cook wrote: >> Hi, any more thoughts on this series? I'd really like to get it into >> -next. It's been running happily for a while now in the Chrome OS ARM >> devices. > > I'm not familiar with se

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] arch/arm: support seccomp

2012-11-15 Thread Will Deacon
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:07:13PM +, Kees Cook wrote: > Hi, any more thoughts on this series? I'd really like to get it into > -next. It's been running happily for a while now in the Chrome OS ARM > devices. I'm not familiar with seccomp in general, but the changes look ok now from an ARM poi

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] arch/arm: support seccomp

2012-11-14 Thread Kees Cook
Hi, any more thoughts on this series? I'd really like to get it into -next. It's been running happily for a while now in the Chrome OS ARM devices. Thanks, -Kees On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > This adds support for seccomp BPF to ARM. When built with the seccomp > improveme

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] arch/arm: support seccomp

2012-11-14 Thread Kees Cook
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On 11/10/2012 02:44 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >> This adds support for seccomp BPF to ARM. When built with the seccomp >> improvement patch waiting in linux-next ("seccomp: Make syscall skipping >> and nr changes more consistent"), this passes

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] arch/arm: support seccomp

2012-11-13 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On 11/10/2012 02:44 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > This adds support for seccomp BPF to ARM. When built with the seccomp > improvement patch waiting in linux-next ("seccomp: Make syscall skipping > and nr changes more consistent"), this passes the seccomp regression > test suite: https://github.com/redpig/

[PATCH v5 0/4] arch/arm: support seccomp

2012-11-10 Thread Kees Cook
This adds support for seccomp BPF to ARM. When built with the seccomp improvement patch waiting in linux-next ("seccomp: Make syscall skipping and nr changes more consistent"), this passes the seccomp regression test suite: https://github.com/redpig/seccomp Thanks, -Kees --- v5: - clean up secc