Hi, any more thoughts on this series? I'd really like to get it into
-next. It's been running happily for a while now in the Chrome OS ARM
devices.
Thanks,
-Kees
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote:
> This adds support for seccomp BPF to ARM. When built with the seccomp
> improvement patch waiting in linux-next ("seccomp: Make syscall skipping
> and nr changes more consistent"), this passes the seccomp regression
> test suite: https://github.com/redpig/seccomp
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Kees
>
> ---
> v5:
> - clean up seccomp failure path, as requested by Will Deacon.
> v4:
> - fixed syscall_get_arch, thanks to Will Deacon.
> v3:
> - updates suggested by Russell King:
> - reduced scope of expansion
> - leveraged TIF_SYSCALL_WORK bit mask
> - fixed syscall==-1 short-circuit logic
> v2:
> - expanded ptrace_syscall_trace() into both callers and do
> secure_computing() hookup there, as requested by Al Viro.
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
