Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] sched: consider missed ticks when updating cpu load

2015-11-11 Thread Byungchul Park
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 06:38:10PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 09:36:00AM +0900, byungchul.p...@lge.com wrote: > > From: Byungchul Park > > > > change from v4 to v5 > > - fix comments and commit message > > - take new_load into account in update_cpu_load_nohz() and > >

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] sched: consider missed ticks when updating cpu load

2015-11-11 Thread Byungchul Park
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 09:36:00AM +0900, byungchul.p...@lge.com wrote: > From: Byungchul Park > > change from v4 to v5 > - fix comments and commit message > - take new_load into account in update_cpu_load_nohz() and __update_cpu_load() > because it's non-zero in NOHZ_FULL > > change from v3 t

[PATCH v5 0/2] sched: consider missed ticks when updating cpu load

2015-11-09 Thread byungchul.park
From: Byungchul Park change from v4 to v5 - fix comments and commit message - take new_load into account in update_cpu_load_nohz() and __update_cpu_load() because it's non-zero in NOHZ_FULL change from v3 to v4 - focus the problem on full NOHZ change from v2 to v3 - add a patch which make __u