From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.p...@lge.com> change from v4 to v5 - fix comments and commit message - take new_load into account in update_cpu_load_nohz() and __update_cpu_load() because it's non-zero in NOHZ_FULL
change from v3 to v4 - focus the problem on full NOHZ change from v2 to v3 - add a patch which make __update_cpu_load() handle active tickless change from v1 to v2 - add some additional commit message (logic is same exactly) additionally i tried to use the return value of hrtimer_forward() instead of jiffies to get pending tick for updating cpu load. it's easy for update_cpu_load_nohz() to do that. but for update_idle_cpu_load(), i need more time to think about how to implement it nicely. and i will try to fix other stuffs caused by full NOHZ later with another patch. i decided to send this patch at first because "cpu load update" is a standalone problem which is not coupled with other stuffs. Byungchul Park (2): sched: make __update_cpu_load() handle NOHZ_FULL tickless sched: make update_cpu_load_nohz() consider missed ticks in NOHZ_FULL include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++-- kernel/sched/fair.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 8 +++---- 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
