On Tuesday 20 November 2012 at 09:34:56, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> I'll try to have a look this week. It fell a bit off because linux-i2c
> was not in CC. I do wonder about the naming, though. VIPERBOARD is
> probably the board name, but not the IP core/SoC name?
I am sorry, that I forgot the CC.
You
> Patches 2,3,4 and 5 all applied. I would really appreciate to get an ACK from
> the i2c folks for patch #4.
I'll try to have a look this week. It fell a bit off because linux-i2c
was not in CC. I do wonder about the naming, though. VIPERBOARD is
probably the board name, but not the IP core/SoC
Hi Lars,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 03:48:23PM +0100, Lars Poeschel wrote:
> From: Lars Poeschel
>
> Add mfd driver for Nano River Technologies viperboard.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lars Poeschel
> ---
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig| 14 +
> drivers/mfd/Makefile |1 +
> drivers/m
From: Lars Poeschel
Add mfd driver for Nano River Technologies viperboard.
Signed-off-by: Lars Poeschel
---
drivers/mfd/Kconfig| 14 +
drivers/mfd/Makefile |1 +
drivers/mfd/viperboard.c | 130
include/linux/mfd/vi
4 matches
Mail list logo