> Patches 2,3,4 and 5 all applied. I would really appreciate to get an ACK from
> the i2c folks for patch #4.

I'll try to have a look this week. It fell a bit off because linux-i2c
was not in CC. I do wonder about the naming, though. VIPERBOARD is
probably the board name, but not the IP core/SoC name?

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to