On Friday, November 16, 2012 10:09:34 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 09:02:36PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Ah, that's what's called by acpi_dev_get_resources(). But what about
> > writing
> > it this way:
> >
> > static int acpi_i2c_find_child_address(struct acpi_re
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 09:02:36PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Ah, that's what's called by acpi_dev_get_resources(). But what about writing
> it this way:
>
> static int acpi_i2c_find_child_address(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
> {
>
>if (ares->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_
On Friday, November 16, 2012 04:17:29 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:21:54 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, November 16, 2012 02:03:57 PM Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > > Hi Rafael,
> > > >
> > > > On
Hi Mika,
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:23:32 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Here's the updated version where we handle 10-bit addresses properly
> (hopefully).
> (...)
> +static int acpi_i2c_find_device(struct device *dev, acpi_handle *handle)
> +{
> (...)
> + memset(&i2c_find, 0, sizeof(i2c_find));
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 04:17:29PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > > +static int acpi_i2c_find_child_address(struct acpi_resource *ares,
> > > > > void *data)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus *sb;
> > > > > + struct acpi_i2c_find *i2c_find = data;
> > > > >
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:21:54 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, November 16, 2012 02:03:57 PM Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > Hi Rafael,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:09:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Thursda
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:21:54 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, November 16, 2012 02:03:57 PM Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:09:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Thursday, November 15, 2012 01:03:17 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > ACPI 5 int
On Friday, November 16, 2012 02:03:57 PM Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:09:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 15, 2012 01:03:17 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > ACPI 5 introduced I2cSerialBus resource that makes it possible to
> > > enumerate
Hi Rafael,
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:09:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, November 15, 2012 01:03:17 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > ACPI 5 introduced I2cSerialBus resource that makes it possible to enumerate
> > and configure the I2C slave devices behind the I2C controller. This patch
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 01:03:17 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> ACPI 5 introduced I2cSerialBus resource that makes it possible to enumerate
> and configure the I2C slave devices behind the I2C controller. This patch
> adds helper functions to support I2C slave enumeration.
>
> An ACPI enabled
ACPI 5 introduced I2cSerialBus resource that makes it possible to enumerate
and configure the I2C slave devices behind the I2C controller. This patch
adds helper functions to support I2C slave enumeration.
An ACPI enabled I2C controller driver only needs to call
acpi_i2c_register_devices()
in ord
11 matches
Mail list logo
