On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 09:02:36PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Ah, that's what's called by acpi_dev_get_resources(). But what about writing
> it this way:
>
> static int acpi_i2c_find_child_address(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
> {
>
> if (ares->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_SERIAL_BUS) {
> struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus *sb;
>
> sb = &ares->data.i2c_serial_bus;
> if (sb->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_SERIAL_TYPE_I2C) {
> struct acpi_i2c_find *i2c_find = data;
>
> if (sb->slave_address == i2c_find->addr)
> i2c_find->found = true;
> }
> }
>
> /* Tell the ACPI core to skip this resource. */
> return 1;
> }
Not a problem at all, I'll do it like above and also with the SPI case.
I'll wait til tomorrow for more comments and post v3 unless there are
objections.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
