On 11/01, David Long wrote:
>
> On 10/29/13 15:59, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>
>> Or. arm can actually reimplement set_swbp(). This doesn't mean the
>> duplication of write_opcode() code, we can simply export this helper.
>>
>
> That actually looks to me like the cleanest approach. I have changed
> th
On 10/29/13 15:59, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 10/28, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Yes, yes, sorry for confusion. What I actually tried to suggest is
something like the trivial patch below.
Then arm can do:
uprobe_opcode_t arch_uprobe_swbp_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe)
{
On 10/28, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Yes, yes, sorry for confusion. What I actually tried to suggest is
> something like the trivial patch below.
>
> Then arm can do:
>
> uprobe_opcode_t arch_uprobe_swbp_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe)
> {
> return __opcode_to_mem_arm(aupr
On 10/23, David Long wrote:
>
> On 10/19/13 12:50, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> On 10/15, David Long wrote:
>>>
>>> Allow arches to write the opcode with a custom function. ARM needs to
>>> customize the swbp instruction depending on the condition code of the
>>> instruction it replaces.
>>
>> Well, we
On 10/19/13 12:50, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 10/15, David Long wrote:
Allow arches to write the opcode with a custom function. ARM needs to
customize the swbp instruction depending on the condition code of the
instruction it replaces.
Well, we already have "__weak set_swbp(auprobe, ...)", can'
On 10/15, David Long wrote:
>
> Allow arches to write the opcode with a custom function. ARM needs to
> customize the swbp instruction depending on the condition code of the
> instruction it replaces.
Well, we already have "__weak set_swbp(auprobe, ...)", can't arm use it?
If not,
> +void __wea
From: Rabin Vincent
Allow arches to write the opcode with a custom function. ARM needs to
customize the swbp instruction depending on the condition code of the
instruction it replaces.
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent
Signed-off-by: David A. Long
---
include/linux/uprobes.h | 3 +++
kernel/even
7 matches
Mail list logo
