From: B K Karthik
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 08:38:55 +0530
> @@ -103,10 +103,10 @@ static int __xfrm6_tunnel_spi_check(struct net *net,
> u32 spi)
> {
> struct xfrm6_tunnel_net *xfrm6_tn = xfrm6_tunnel_pernet(net);
> struct xfrm6_tunnel_spi *x6spi;
> - int index = xfrm6_tunnel_spi_
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 10:35:12PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 8:09 PM B K Karthik wrote:
> > @@ -103,10 +103,10 @@ static int __xfrm6_tunnel_spi_check(struct net *net,
> > u32 spi)
> > {
> > struct xfrm6_tunnel_net *xfrm6_tn = xfrm6_tunnel_pernet(net);
> >
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 1:37 AM Cong Wang wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 11:12 PM B K Karthik wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 11:05 AM Cong Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 8:09 PM B K Karthik
> > > wrote:
> > > > @@ -103,10 +103,10 @@ static int __xfrm6_tunnel_spi_ch
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 11:12 PM B K Karthik wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 11:05 AM Cong Wang wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 8:09 PM B K Karthik wrote:
> > > @@ -103,10 +103,10 @@ static int __xfrm6_tunnel_spi_check(struct net
> > > *net, u32 spi)
> > > {
> > > struct xfrm
Hi K,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on ipsec/master]
[also build test WARNING on ipsec-next/master sparc-next/master net-next/master
net/master v5.8-rc6 next-20200724]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And wh
Hi K,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on ipsec/master]
[also build test WARNING on ipsec-next/master sparc-next/master net-next/master
net/master v5.8-rc6 next-20200724]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And wh
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 11:05 AM Cong Wang wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 8:09 PM B K Karthik wrote:
> > @@ -103,10 +103,10 @@ static int __xfrm6_tunnel_spi_check(struct net *net,
> > u32 spi)
> > {
> > struct xfrm6_tunnel_net *xfrm6_tn = xfrm6_tunnel_pernet(net);
> > struct
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 8:09 PM B K Karthik wrote:
> @@ -103,10 +103,10 @@ static int __xfrm6_tunnel_spi_check(struct net *net,
> u32 spi)
> {
> struct xfrm6_tunnel_net *xfrm6_tn = xfrm6_tunnel_pernet(net);
> struct xfrm6_tunnel_spi *x6spi;
> - int index = xfrm6_tunnel_spi_
__xfrm_tunnel_spi_check used xfrm6_tunnel_spi_has_byspi
which returns spi % XFRM6_TUNNEL_SPI_BYSPI_HSIZE.
whereas xfrm6_tunnel_spi_hash_byaddr makes a call to
ipv6_addr_hash.
netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim1: set [1, 0] type 2 family 0 port 6081 - 0
netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim2: set [1, 0] type
9 matches
Mail list logo
