On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 10:35:12PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 8:09 PM B K Karthik <bkkart...@pesu.pes.edu> wrote:
> > @@ -103,10 +103,10 @@ static int __xfrm6_tunnel_spi_check(struct net *net,
> > u32 spi)
> > {
> > struct xfrm6_tunnel_net *xfrm6_tn = xfrm6_tunnel_pernet(net);
> > struct xfrm6_tunnel_spi *x6spi;
> > - int index = xfrm6_tunnel_spi_hash_byspi(spi);
> > + int index = xfrm6_tunnel_spi_hash_byaddr((const xfrm_address_t
> > *)spi);
> >
> > hlist_for_each_entry(x6spi,
> > - &xfrm6_tn->spi_byspi[index],
> > + &xfrm6_tn->spi_byaddr[index],
> > list_byspi) {
> > if (x6spi->spi == spi)
>
> How did you convince yourself this is correct? This lookup is still
> using spi. :)
This can not be correct, it takes a u32 spi value and casts it to a
pointer to an IP address.
