Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: input: pwm-vibrator: correct pwms in example

2018-10-12 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 20:48:58 -0400, Brian Masney wrote: > In the example for the pwm-vibrator bindings, pwm8 is the direction pin, > and pwm9 is the enable pin. The pwms on the vibrator node has these two > values swapped so this patch corrects it. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney > --- > Changes

Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: input: pwm-vibrator: correct pwms in example

2018-09-26 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Hi, On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 08:48:58PM -0400, Brian Masney wrote: > In the example for the pwm-vibrator bindings, pwm8 is the direction pin, > and pwm9 is the enable pin. The pwms on the vibrator node has these two > values swapped so this patch corrects it. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney > ---

[PATCH v2] dt-bindings: input: pwm-vibrator: correct pwms in example

2018-09-26 Thread Brian Masney
In the example for the pwm-vibrator bindings, pwm8 is the direction pin, and pwm9 is the enable pin. The pwms on the vibrator node has these two values swapped so this patch corrects it. Signed-off-by: Brian Masney --- Changes since v1: - Swapped the pwms values instead of the pwm-names values si