Hi,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 08:48:58PM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> In the example for the pwm-vibrator bindings, pwm8 is the direction pin,
> and pwm9 is the enable pin. The pwms on the vibrator node has these two
> values swapped so this patch corrects it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masn...@onstation.org>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Swapped the pwms values instead of the pwm-names values since enable
> is required and direction is optional. Based on feedback from
> Rob Herring.
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/pwm-vibrator.txt | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/pwm-vibrator.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/pwm-vibrator.txt
> index 09145d18491d..88c775a3fe21 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/pwm-vibrator.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/pwm-vibrator.txt
> @@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ Example from Motorola Droid 4:
>
> vibrator {
> compatible = "pwm-vibrator";
> - pwms = <&pwm8 0 1000000000 0>,
> - <&pwm9 0 1000000000 0>;
> + pwms = <&pwm9 0 1000000000 0>,
> + <&pwm8 0 1000000000 0>;
> pwm-names = "enable", "direction";
> direction-duty-cycle-ns = <1000000000>;
> };Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reic...@collabora.com> -- Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
