On 10/4/24 06:44, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 9/24/24 6:37 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
>> There are other .sh tests that could better use the test_progs migration. In
>> particular the ones without existing test coverage. For non XDP related,
>> test_tcp_check_syncookie.sh, test_flow_dissector.sh,
On 9/24/24 6:37 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
There are other .sh tests that could better use the test_progs migration. In
particular the ones without existing test coverage. For non XDP related,
test_tcp_check_syncookie.sh, test_flow_dissector.sh, and test_tc_edt.sh should
be the good ones.
I
Hi Martin,
On 9/25/24 22:01, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 9/25/24 3:37 AM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
>> I am not sure which case in xdp_features.c does not have existing coverage in
>> test_progs. From a quick look, it seems only BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP is missing
>> (please check)?
>
> Re: CPUMAP, I n
On 9/25/24 3:37 AM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
I am not sure which case in xdp_features.c does not have existing coverage in
test_progs. From a quick look, it seems only BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP is missing
(please check)?
Re: CPUMAP, I noticed there is a xdp_(cpu)map_attach.c test but it only does
at
On 9/22/24 12:04 PM, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
Hello all, sorry for the slow feedback, I have been off last week.
On 9/14/24 15:38, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 11:25:47 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
On Sep 13, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
test a physical network device that supports a ce
Hello all, sorry for the slow feedback, I have been off last week.
On 9/14/24 15:38, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 11:25:47 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
>> On Sep 13, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
>>> test a physical network device that supports a certain XDP features.
>>>
>>> iiuc, test_
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 11:25:47 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> On Sep 13, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> > test a physical network device that supports a certain XDP features.
> >
> > iiuc, test_xdp_features.sh only uses the veth and veth will also be the only
> > device tested after moving to prog_tests
On Sep 13, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 9/10/24 11:10 AM, Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) wrote:
> > test_xdp_features.sh is a shell script allowing to test that xdp features
> > advertised by an interface are indeed delivered. The test works by starting
> > two instance of the same program, both
On 9/10/24 11:10 AM, Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) wrote:
test_xdp_features.sh is a shell script allowing to test that xdp features
advertised by an interface are indeed delivered. The test works by starting
two instance of the same program, both attaching specific xdp programs to
each side of
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 10:17:13PM +0200, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 9/11/24 16:18, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_features.c
> >> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_features.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> i
Hi Simon,
On 9/11/24 16:18, Simon Horman wrote:
[...]
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_features.c
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_features.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index ..bcb36a2d2767
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bp
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 08:10:35PM +0200, Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
wrote:
> test_xdp_features.sh is a shell script allowing to test that xdp features
> advertised by an interface are indeed delivered. The test works by starting
> two instance of the same program, both attaching specific xd
test_xdp_features.sh is a shell script allowing to test that xdp features
advertised by an interface are indeed delivered. The test works by starting
two instance of the same program, both attaching specific xdp programs to
each side of a veth link, and then make those programs manage packets and
c
13 matches
Mail list logo
