On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 10:17:13PM +0200, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> On 9/11/24 16:18, Simon Horman wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_features.c 
> >> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_features.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..bcb36a2d2767
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_features.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,446 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * Test XDP features
> >> + *
> >> + * Sets up a veth pair, and for each xdp feature under test:
> >> + * - asks the tested interface its xdp capabilities through bpf_xdp_query
> >> + * - attach and run some specific programs on both interfaces to check if
> >> + *   announced capability is respected
> >> + */
> > 
> > Hi Alexis,
> > 
> > This is neither a full review nor an issue that needs to block progress.
> > But, FWIIW, the comment above is not a Kernel doc, yet starts with '/**'.
> > I suggest that it should start with '/*' instead.
> 
> ACK. I'll wait for more comments on the series, and add the fix to the
> corresponding revision, if any.

Thanks, much appreciated.

Reply via email to