Em Tue, May 12, 2015 at 02:43:44PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 06:27:58PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > I disagree, since the support is there, we need to have it in
> > hists->events_stats[PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES].
> > But that can be done in a follow u
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 06:27:58PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:40:56PM +, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> > > Em Sun, May 10, 2015 at 03:13:15PM -0400, Kan Liang escreveu:
> > > > $ perf record -e '{cycles:p,instructions:p}' -c 20003 --no-time
> > > > ~/tchain ~/t
Em Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:40:56PM +, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> > Em Sun, May 10, 2015 at 03:13:15PM -0400, Kan Liang escreveu:
> > > $ perf record -e '{cycles:p,instructions:p}' -c 20003 --no-time
> > > ~/tchain ~/tchain [perf record: Woken up 148 times to write data]
> > > [perf record: Captured
>
> Em Sun, May 10, 2015 at 03:13:15PM -0400, Kan Liang escreveu:
> > From: Kan Liang
> >
> > This patch modified the perf tool to handle the new RECORD type,
> > PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES.
> > The number of lost-sample events is stored in
> > .nr_events[PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES]. While the exact
Em Sun, May 10, 2015 at 03:13:15PM -0400, Kan Liang escreveu:
> From: Kan Liang
>
> This patch modified the perf tool to handle the new RECORD type,
> PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES.
> The number of lost-sample events is stored in
> .nr_events[PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES]. While the exact number of sample
From: Kan Liang
This patch modified the perf tool to handle the new RECORD type,
PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES.
The number of lost-sample events is stored in
.nr_events[PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES]. While the exact number of samples
which the kernel dropped is stored in total_lost_samples.
When the perce
6 matches
Mail list logo
