Em Tue, May 12, 2015 at 02:43:44PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu: > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 06:27:58PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > I disagree, since the support is there, we need to have it in > > hists->events_stats[PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES].
> > But that can be done in a follow up patch. > Agreed, it would be good to know of which event the samples got lost. > > It just came quickly to my attention because of all the discussion about > > where to store something (PERF_SAMPLE_ID via sample_type + sample_id_all) > > that doesn't get used in the patch that introduces it :-) > > > > I'll try to test this all tomorrow and will try to do the needed wiring > > to hists_evsel->hists->events_stats. > > > > All working I can push this all via my perf/core event, if PeterZ > > agrees and is ok with the kernel specific bits. > > I would like to carry these as there some conflicts with other patches I > have. So go ahead and do it, when it lands on tip I'll check and try to continue what was discussed here, thanks! - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
