On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 11/21/2012 01:28 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Oh and there was this comment/TODO:
>> I was thinking that if your patch set is introducing a
>> plethora of new users of these hooks we should maybe
>> stick a patch at the beginning of the s
On 11/21/2012 01:28 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Oh and there was this comment/TODO:
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>
>> @@ -17,15 +17,6 @@
>> * Initialise the kernels jiffy timer source, claim interrupt
>> * using setup_irq. This is called early on during init
Oh and there was this comment/TODO:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> @@ -17,15 +17,6 @@
> * Initialise the kernels jiffy timer source, claim interrupt
> * using setup_irq. This is called early on during initialisation
> * while interrupts are still disabled o
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> These fields duplicate e.g. struct clock_event_device's suspend and
> resume fields, so remove them now that nothing is using them. The aim
> is to remove all fields from struct sys_timer except .init, then replace
From: Stephen Warren
These fields duplicate e.g. struct clock_event_device's suspend and
resume fields, so remove them now that nothing is using them. The aim
is to remove all fields from struct sys_timer except .init, then replace
the ARM machine descriptor's .timer field with a .init_time funct
5 matches
Mail list logo