On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > On 11/21/2012 01:28 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Oh and there was this comment/TODO: >> I was thinking that if your patch set is introducing a >> plethora of new users of these hooks we should maybe >> stick a patch at the beginning of the series renaming the >> hooks to *_noirq, but if it's a major obstacle it can surely wait. > > I think I'd prefer to keep that rename separate and do it later; while > this series does introduce a few new users of the type, there are many > more pre-existing users. Renaming all the users would end up making this > series potentially conflict with addition of new users in tip.git or > elsewhere, whereas any possible current conflicts from this series > should be resolvable in arm-soc pretty easily I hope, so I'd rather > create a separate series that does the rename, and probably apply it to > tip.git, probably for 3.10? Sure no big deal. Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
