On 01/17/2014 10:04 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:51:44AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> On 01/17/2014 04:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:17:36AM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
+ /*
+ * Normalize the fau
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:51:44AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 01/17/2014 04:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:17:36AM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> >> + /*
> >> + * Normalize the faults_from, so all tasks in a group
> >> +
On 01/17/2014 04:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:17:36AM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * Normalize the faults_from, so all tasks in a group
>> + * count according to CPU use, instead of by the raw
>> +
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:17:36AM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> + /*
> + * Normalize the faults_from, so all tasks in a group
> + * count according to CPU use, instead of by the raw
> + * number of faults. This pr
From: Rik van Riel
The tracepoint has made it abundantly clear that the naive
implementation of the faults_from code has issues.
Specifically, the garbage collector in some workloads will
access orders of magnitudes more memory than the threads
that do all the active work. This resulted in the n
5 matches
Mail list logo