Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: proximity: sx9500: Fix proximity value

2015-06-13 Thread Daniel Baluta
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 12/06/15 08:40, Vlad Dogaru wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 06:49:34PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote: >>> Because of the ABI confusion proximity value exposed by SX9500 >>> was inverted. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta >> >> Review

Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: proximity: sx9500: Fix proximity value

2015-06-13 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 12/06/15 08:40, Vlad Dogaru wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 06:49:34PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote: >> Because of the ABI confusion proximity value exposed by SX9500 >> was inverted. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta > > Reviewed-by: Vlad Dogaru > > Sorry for causing the confusion, it was t

Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: proximity: sx9500: Fix proximity value

2015-06-12 Thread Vlad Dogaru
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 06:49:34PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote: > Because of the ABI confusion proximity value exposed by SX9500 > was inverted. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta Reviewed-by: Vlad Dogaru Sorry for causing the confusion, it was the only proximity sensor I had encountered to date.

[PATCH 2/2] iio: proximity: sx9500: Fix proximity value

2015-06-11 Thread Daniel Baluta
Because of the ABI confusion proximity value exposed by SX9500 was inverted. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta --- drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c index 2042e37..01494cd