On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 06:49:34PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote: > Because of the ABI confusion proximity value exposed by SX9500 > was inverted. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.bal...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlad Dogaru <vlad.dog...@intel.com> Sorry for causing the confusion, it was the only proximity sensor I had encountered to date. > --- > drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c > index 2042e37..01494cd 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c > @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static int sx9500_read_prox_data(struct sx9500_data *data, > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > > - *val = 32767 - (s16)be16_to_cpu(regval); > + *val = be16_to_cpu(regval); > > return IIO_VAL_INT; > } > -- > 1.9.1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
