RE: [PATCH 1/3] opp: of: Support multiple suspend OPPs defined in DT

Hi, Viresh > On 09-07-19, 15:10, anson.hu...@nxp.com wrote: > > From: Anson Huang > > > > With property "opp-supported-hw" introduced, the OPP table in DT could > > be a large OPP table and ONLY a subset of OPPs are available, based on > > the version of the hardware running on. That introduces r

Re: [PATCH 1/3] opp: of: Support multiple suspend OPPs defined in DT

On 09-07-19, 15:10, anson.hu...@nxp.com wrote: > From: Anson Huang > > With property "opp-supported-hw" introduced, the OPP table > in DT could be a large OPP table and ONLY a subset of OPPs > are available, based on the version of the hardware running > on. That introduces restriction of using "

[PATCH 1/3] opp: of: Support multiple suspend OPPs defined in DT

From: Anson Huang With property "opp-supported-hw" introduced, the OPP table in DT could be a large OPP table and ONLY a subset of OPPs are available, based on the version of the hardware running on. That introduces restriction of using "opp-suspend" property to define the suspend OPP, as we are