On 09-07-19, 15:10, anson.hu...@nxp.com wrote: > From: Anson Huang <anson.hu...@nxp.com> > > With property "opp-supported-hw" introduced, the OPP table > in DT could be a large OPP table and ONLY a subset of OPPs > are available, based on the version of the hardware running > on. That introduces restriction of using "opp-suspend" > property to define the suspend OPP, as we are NOT sure if the > OPP containing "opp-suspend" property is available for the > hardware running on, and the of opp core does NOT allow multiple > suspend OPPs defined in DT OPP table. > > To eliminate this restrition, make of opp core allow multiple > suspend OPPs defined in DT, and pick the OPP with highest rate > and with "opp-suspend" property present to be suspend OPP, it > can speed up the suspend/resume process. > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <anson.hu...@nxp.com> > --- > drivers/opp/of.c | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Please update the DT bindings first. FWIW, all three patches look fine otherwise. -- viresh