On 07/29/2016 06:00 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:13:40AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:25:13AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:49:47PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
Seems you're all missing the obvious.
Add a trace
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:13:40AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:25:13AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:49:47PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > Seems you're all missing the obvious.
> > >
> > > Add a tracepoint for a shrinker callback that includ
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:25:13AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:49:47PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Seems you're all missing the obvious.
> >
> > Add a tracepoint for a shrinker callback that includes a "name"
> > field, have the shrinker callback fill it out appropriat
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:49:47PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Seems you're all missing the obvious.
>
> Add a tracepoint for a shrinker callback that includes a "name"
> field, have the shrinker callback fill it out appropriately. e.g
> in the superblock shrinker:
>
> trace_shrinker_callb
[line wrap text at 72 columns, please]
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:40:57AM -0700, Tony Jones wrote:
> On 07/20/2016 07:54 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Wed 20-07-16 20:11:09, Janani Ravichandran wrote:
> >>>On Jul 11, 2016, at 8:03 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>>On Mon 11-07-16 10:12:51, Rik van Ri
On 07/20/2016 07:54 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Wed 20-07-16 20:11:09, Janani Ravichandran wrote:
On Jul 11, 2016, at 8:03 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Mon 11-07-16 10:12:51, Rik van Riel wrote:
What mechanism do you have in mind for obtaining the name,
Michal?
Not sure whether tracing infr
On 07/23/2016 12:43 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Janani,
> it may make sense to have the code Tony posted be part of
> your patch series. Just have both of your Signed-off-by:
> lines on that patch.
Rik
Unfortunately the previous patch doesn't work on my system, which was the point
I was trying t
On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 21:05 -0700, Tony Jones wrote:
> On 07/22/2016 06:27 PM, Tony Jones wrote:
> > On 07/20/2016 07:54 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >
> > > > Michal, just to make sure I understand you correctly, do you
> > > > mean that we
> > > > could infer the names of the shrinkers by looking a
On 07/22/2016 06:27 PM, Tony Jones wrote:
> On 07/20/2016 07:54 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
>>> Michal, just to make sure I understand you correctly, do you mean that we
>>> could infer the names of the shrinkers by looking at the names of their
>>> callbacks?
>>
>> Yes, %ps can then be used for th
On 07/20/2016 07:54 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> Michal, just to make sure I understand you correctly, do you mean that we
>> could infer the names of the shrinkers by looking at the names of their
>> callbacks?
>
> Yes, %ps can then be used for the name of the shrinker structure
> (assuming it is
On Wed 20-07-16 20:11:09, Janani Ravichandran wrote:
>
> > On Jul 11, 2016, at 8:03 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >
> > On Mon 11-07-16 10:12:51, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >>
> >> What mechanism do you have in mind for obtaining the name,
> >> Michal?
> >
> > Not sure whether tracing infrastructure al
> On Jul 11, 2016, at 8:03 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> On Mon 11-07-16 10:12:51, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>
>> What mechanism do you have in mind for obtaining the name,
>> Michal?
>
> Not sure whether tracing infrastructure allows printk like %ps. If not
> then it doesn't sound too hard to add.
On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 08:37 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sat 09-07-16 04:43:31, Janani Ravichandran wrote:
> > Struct shrinker does not have a field to uniquely identify the
> > shrinkers
> > it represents. It would be helpful to have a new field to hold
> > names of
> > shrinkers. This informat
On Mon 11-07-16 10:12:51, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 08:37 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Sat 09-07-16 04:43:31, Janani Ravichandran wrote:
> > > Struct shrinker does not have a field to uniquely identify the
> > > shrinkers
> > > it represents. It would be helpful to have a new
On Sat 09-07-16 04:43:31, Janani Ravichandran wrote:
> Struct shrinker does not have a field to uniquely identify the shrinkers
> it represents. It would be helpful to have a new field to hold names of
> shrinkers. This information would be useful while analyzing their
> behavior using tracepoints.
Struct shrinker does not have a field to uniquely identify the shrinkers
it represents. It would be helpful to have a new field to hold names of
shrinkers. This information would be useful while analyzing their
behavior using tracepoints.
---
include/linux/shrinker.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 inse
16 matches
Mail list logo
