On Sat 09-07-16 04:43:31, Janani Ravichandran wrote:
> Struct shrinker does not have a field to uniquely identify the shrinkers
> it represents. It would be helpful to have a new field to hold names of
> shrinkers. This information would be useful while analyzing their
> behavior using tracepoints.
This will however increase the vmlinux size even when no tracing is
enabled. Why cannot we simply print the name of the shrinker callbacks?
>
> ---
> include/linux/shrinker.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
> index 4fcacd9..431125c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
> +++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct shrinker {
> unsigned long (*scan_objects)(struct shrinker *,
> struct shrink_control *sc);
>
> + const char *name;
> int seeks; /* seeks to recreate an obj */
> long batch; /* reclaim batch size, 0 = default */
> unsigned long flags;
> --
> 2.7.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majord...@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"d...@kvack.org";> em...@kvack.org </a>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
