Len Brown writes:
> From: Len Brown
>
> pm_idle() on ARM was a synonym for default_idle(),
> so simply invoke default_idle() directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Looks good to me.
Tested this patch along with 15/16 (removes global declaration) on a
On 02/11/2013 11:11 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 04:02:30PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 05:58:13AM +, Len Brown wrote:
>>> pm_idle() on ARM was a synonym for default_idle(),
>>> so simply invoke default_idle() directly.
>>
>> The cle
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 04:02:30PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 05:58:13AM +, Len Brown wrote:
> > pm_idle() on ARM was a synonym for default_idle(),
> > so simply invoke default_idle() directly.
>
> The clean-up looks fine as we already have an arm_pm_idle but longe
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 05:58:13AM +, Len Brown wrote:
> pm_idle() on ARM was a synonym for default_idle(),
> so simply invoke default_idle() directly.
The clean-up looks fine as we already have an arm_pm_idle but longer
term I was thinking about having a common declaration similar to
pm_power
From: Len Brown
pm_idle() on ARM was a synonym for default_idle(),
so simply invoke default_idle() directly.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
---
arch/arm/kernel/process.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ar
5 matches
Mail list logo