On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 05:58:13AM +0000, Len Brown wrote: > pm_idle() on ARM was a synonym for default_idle(), > so simply invoke default_idle() directly.
The clean-up looks fine as we already have an arm_pm_idle but longer term I was thinking about having a common declaration similar to pm_power_off that code under drivers/power/(reset/) can override (and such driver may be shared by multiple architectures). OTOH, if you get rid of the generic linux/pm.h declaration architectures can use a common pm_idle name and type (though I think having it in the common header would be better). For ARM this would mean s/arm_pm_idle/pm_idle/ on top if your patch. Do you have any plans with pm_power_off as well? Thanks. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
