Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-05-23 Thread Jan Kara
On Tue 22-05-07 15:39:31, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Eric Sandeen wrote: > > > Jan - > > > > I ran 2.6.21 + your udf patches from -mm through some udf tests which, > > oddly enough, can be found in the xfstests test suite in xfsprogs cvs > > from sgi. > > > > It looks much better than before, but I w

Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-05-22 Thread Eric Sandeen
Eric Sandeen wrote: > Jan - > > I ran 2.6.21 + your udf patches from -mm through some udf tests which, > oddly enough, can be found in the xfstests test suite in xfsprogs cvs > from sgi. > > It looks much better than before, but I was able to trip some of your > asserts. They were generated whi

Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-05-03 Thread Jan Kara
On Fri 27-04-07 16:54:20, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Jan Kara wrote: > > Hello, > > > > the patches attached to six following emails implement some cleanup and > > fixes in the UDF code. The main two fixes are: > > 1) UDF now works correctly for files larger than 1GB. > > 2) Deleting a director

Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-04-27 Thread Eric Sandeen
Jan Kara wrote: > Hello, > > the patches attached to six following emails implement some cleanup and > fixes in the UDF code. The main two fixes are: > 1) UDF now works correctly for files larger than 1GB. > 2) Deleting a directory updates number of links to the parent directory > cor

Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-04-16 Thread Jan Kara
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 18:01:12 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Wed 04-04-07 08:36:20, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 10:48:27 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > Well, it works for me on 32-bit as well, right up to 100% full. > > > > No problems at all..

Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-04-12 Thread Tino Keitel
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 18:01:12 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Wed 04-04-07 08:36:20, Tino Keitel wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 10:48:27 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > Well, it works for me on 32-bit as well, right up to 100% full. > > > No problems at all... > > > > Maybe

Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-04-12 Thread Jan Kara
On Wed 04-04-07 08:36:20, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 10:48:27 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > [...] > > > Well, it works for me on 32-bit as well, right up to 100% full. > > No problems at all... > > Maybe it depends on the kernel. I patched 2.6.20 with the patches > above and g

Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-04-03 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 10:48:27 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: [...] > Well, it works for me on 32-bit as well, right up to 100% full. > No problems at all... Maybe it depends on the kernel. I patched 2.6.20 with the patches above and got the described behaviour. Regards, Tino - To unsubscribe fro

Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-04-02 Thread Chuck Ebbert
Tino Keitel wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 14:06:34 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: >> Tino Keitel wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 17:44:47 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: Hello, the patches attached to six following emails implement some cleanup and fixes in the UDF code. The main t

Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-04-02 Thread Jan Kara
On Fri 30-03-07 06:59:23, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 17:44:47 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > Hello, > > > > the patches attached to six following emails implement some cleanup and > > fixes in the UDF code. The main two fixes are: > > 1) UDF now works correctly for files larger

Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-04-02 Thread Jan Kara
On Fri 30-03-07 06:59:23, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 17:44:47 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > Hello, > > > > the patches attached to six following emails implement some cleanup and > > fixes in the UDF code. The main two fixes are: > > 1) UDF now works correctly for files larger

Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-03-31 Thread Tino Keitel
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 14:06:34 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > Tino Keitel wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 17:44:47 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> the patches attached to six following emails implement some cleanup and > >> fixes in the UDF code. The main two fixes are: > >> 1

Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-03-30 Thread Chuck Ebbert
Tino Keitel wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 17:44:47 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: >> Hello, >> >> the patches attached to six following emails implement some cleanup and >> fixes in the UDF code. The main two fixes are: >> 1) UDF now works correctly for files larger than 1GB. > > Hi, > > I tried

Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-03-29 Thread Tino Keitel
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 17:44:47 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > Hello, > > the patches attached to six following emails implement some cleanup and > fixes in the UDF code. The main two fixes are: > 1) UDF now works correctly for files larger than 1GB. Hi, I tried 2.6.20 with your patches and got

[PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-03-06 Thread Jan Kara
Hello, the patches attached to six following emails implement some cleanup and fixes in the UDF code. The main two fixes are: 1) UDF now works correctly for files larger than 1GB. 2) Deleting a directory updates number of links to the parent directory correctly. See headers of followi