Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Jan -
>
> I ran 2.6.21 + your udf patches from -mm through some udf tests which,
> oddly enough, can be found in the xfstests test suite in xfsprogs cvs
> from sgi.
>
> It looks much better than before, but I was able to trip some of your
> asserts. They were generated while fsx was running. The good news,
> though, is that fsx passed. :) I haven't looked into it much further
> yet, but wanted to let you know.
Here's a short hacky testcase that trips the assert around line 123 of
udf/truncate.c I'm looking into it but you may immediately see what the
problem is...?
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main(int argc, char ** argv)
{
int fd;
char buf[65536];
fd = open("testfile", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT);
lseek(fd, 16797, SEEK_SET);
write(fd, buf, 22935);
close(fd);
fd = open("testfile", O_WRONLY);
lseek(fd, 31281, SEEK_SET);
write(fd, buf, 9592);
close(fd);
}
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
