> I'm not sure that "[PATCH 3/3] mm/memory-failure.c: support dedicated
> thread to handle SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO)" is a -stable thing? That's a
> feature addition more than a bugfix?
No - the old behavior was crazy - someone with a multithreaded process might
well expect that if they call prctl(PF
On Fri, 30 May 2014 14:24:52 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi
wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:25:39PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > This patchset is the summary of recent discussion about memory error
> > > handling
> > > on multithread application. Patch 1 and 2 is for action required errors,
> > >
> This patchset is the summary of recent discussion about memory error handling
> on multithread application. Patch 1 and 2 is for action required errors, and
> patch 3 is for action optional errors.
Naoya,
You suggested early in the discussion (when there were just two patches) that
they deserve
This patchset is the summary of recent discussion about memory error handling
on multithread application. Patch 1 and 2 is for action required errors, and
patch 3 is for action optional errors.
This patchset is based on mmotm-2014-05-21-16-57.
Patches are also available on the following tree/bran
4 matches
Mail list logo
