On Wednesday 07 March 2007 07:57, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is another attempt on x86_64 relocatable bzImage patches(V4). This
> patchset makes a bzImage relocatable and same kernel binary can be loaded
> and run from different physical addresses.
I merged them all for now. Thanks.
-Andi
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:07:23PM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 10:10 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 10:15:02AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 07:49 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > > Hi.
> >
Hi.
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 10:10 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 10:15:02AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 07:49 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 07:07 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > > On Wed
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 10:15:02AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 07:49 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 07:07 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:27 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > >
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 10:15:02AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 07:49 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 07:07 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:27 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > >
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 07:07:39AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:27 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is another attempt on x86_64 relocatable bzImage patches(V4). This
> > patchset makes a bzImage relocatable and same kernel binary can be loaded
> > and ru
Hi.
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 07:49 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 07:07 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:27 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Here is another attempt on x86_64 relocatable bzImage patches(V4). This
> > > patchs
Hi.
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 07:07 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:27 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is another attempt on x86_64 relocatable bzImage patches(V4). This
> > patchset makes a bzImage relocatable and same kernel binary can be loaded
> > and run
Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:27 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is another attempt on x86_64 relocatable bzImage patches(V4). This
>> patchset makes a bzImage relocatable and same kernel binary can be loaded
>> and run from different physical
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:27 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is another attempt on x86_64 relocatable bzImage patches(V4). This
> patchset makes a bzImage relocatable and same kernel binary can be loaded
> and run from different physical addresses.
have these patches been extensively tes
Hi,
Here is another attempt on x86_64 relocatable bzImage patches(V4). This
patchset makes a bzImage relocatable and same kernel binary can be loaded
and run from different physical addresses.
As on now, this mainly helps distros who have to ship an extra kernel compiled
for a different physical
11 matches
Mail list logo