On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:07:23PM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 10:10 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 10:15:02AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > > > On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 07:49 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 07:07 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:27 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is another attempt on x86_64 relocatable bzImage patches(V4). > > > > > > This > > > > > > patchset makes a bzImage relocatable and same kernel binary can be > > > > > > loaded > > > > > > and run from different physical addresses. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have these patches been extensively tested with various suspend > > > > > scenarios? (S1,S3,S4 in acpi speak or s2ram and s2disk in Linux speak) > > > > > > > > We did work on this for RHEL5, getting relocatable kernel support > > > > working fine with S4. While doing it and since, I've been running > > > > Suspend2 with the same patch. > > > > > > > > Since that work, Vivek has done more modifications, but I can confirm > > > > that the basic design is reliable with S4. Haven't tried S3, but can do. > > > > Will report back shortly. > > > > > > S3 works okay here with a relocatable x86_64 kernel (2.6.20). > > > > > > > Hi Nigel, > > > > Is it possible to test S3 with 2.6.21-rc2 kernels also. Right now I don't > > have access to any machine supporting S3. I tested it at the time of my last > > posting and it had worked well. Appreciate your help. > > Tested with rc3 (rc2 wouldn't compile), and it works fine. >
Thanks a lot Nigel. > If you're willing, please add > > Signed-off-by: Nigel Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > or > > Acked-by: Nigel Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > to the hibernation related parts as you see appropriate, since I helped > (albeit in a minor way compared to your work and Eric's work) with > preparing and testing them for RHEL5 and have confirmed they're still ok > in this version. Sure. You have helped a lot. I think either Andi or Andrew needs to add "Acked-by:" string while adding the hibernation related patches (Assuming they decide do pick up the patches.) Thanks Vivek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
